For more information about CBD Oil & Its Implication on Drug Policies in the Workplace, click here or visit our site to learn more! Lately, products containing CBD (from beer to skin cream to oils that can be diffused and vaped) seem to be all the rage. Why are CBD products suddenly In many states, there are laws against bosses testing employees for drug use. Pennsylvania does not have restrictions preventing private employers from checking their workers. There are many arguments for why testing may violate the civil rights of jobholders. Here are some reasons why a test might reveal drugs, followed by a few legal rationales
CBD Oil & Its Implication on Drug Policies in the Workplace
Cannabidoil, or CBD, is derived from the hemp plant, a relative of the marijuana plant. CBD oil has seen a surge in popularity in the recent years among customers who use it for treating various conditions such as anxiety, insomnia and chronic pain. However, its growing popularity comes with many questions for employers.  At times, CBD oil can contain traces of THC, which is considered a controlled substance, and can result in positive drug tests. However, CBD oil by itself does not usually cause a high. CBD oil is legal in all 50 states with varying degrees of restrictions, but its legality will likely change over the coming years. There is very little guidance from the courts on whether employers should accommodate CBD use when creating their drug policy.
In Pennsylvania, an employer sought judicial review of an unemployment order that held the employee was not ineligible for unemployment compensation after the employee admitted to use of CBD oil, tested positive for marijuana and was terminated.  The employer had a policy providing that being under the influence of drugs or having drugs in one’s system while at work was ground for termination. The policy defined “drug” as “any substance producing effects on the central nervous system, or any controlled substance.” The employee disclosed she took CBD oil to manage her cancer-related symptoms before being administered the drug test. The court found the employee did not violate the drug policy because the CBD oil ingested was not a controlled substance, and the employer presented no evidence the oil ingested would affect the employee’s performance in ways prohibited by the policy.
In North Carolina, a woman was fired from her job for using an over-the-counter CBD oil after a drug test revealed THC in her system.  The woman used CBD oil to treat chronic pain from fibromyalgia, which had been cleared by her rheumatologist and disclosed to her employer.
In a lawsuit claiming wrongful termination and damages, the woman noted that the low levels of THC did not meet the threshold level of being impaired under federal Department of Transportation regulations. The lawsuit claims that due to the low amounts of THC, the woman tested negative for purposes of driving a commercial vehicle and was not impaired.  The court held that CBD oil is a legal product under North Carolina law, even if it contains small amounts of THC that would otherwise be considered a controlled substance.
Court decisions such as these create a great deal of questions for employers and their drug policies. Should employers who have a zero-tolerance drug policy accommodate employees who use CBD products? What should an employer do if an employee tests positive on a drug test and blames the use of CBD products which are legal? Does the level of THC in an employee’s system have any weight on an employer’s decision to terminate? The answer to these questions will continue to evolve as we learn more about CBD products. Like many other states, North Carolina’s laws are likely to evolve as we learn more about CBD.
While many CBD products do not contain enough THC to result in a positive drug test, CBD products are not regulated in the U.S., which means there is no way to ensure THC levels remain low in products. Employers should educate employees on this issue and carefully examine the CBD and controlled substances laws in their jurisdiction. Handling positive drug tests where an employee blames the use of a legal CBD product may need to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Employers should consult with their employment attorney before revising their drug policy.
 Peter Grinspoon, Cannabidiol (CBD) – What We Know and What We Don’t, Harvard Health Publishing, https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/cannabidiol-cbd-what-we-know-and-what-we-dont-2018082414476 (last visited Sep. 30, 2020).
 Washington Health Sys. v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Review, 231 A.3d 79 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2020).
 Joe Marusak, Woman Used Over-the-Counter Oil to Treat Chronic Pain. It got her Fired, Lawsuit says, The Charlotte Observer, https://www.charlotteobserver.com/article232244097.html (last visited Sep. 30, 2020).
 Smith v. Manheim Remarketing, Inc et al, No. 5:19CV00086 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 25, 2019).
About the Author
Georgia H. Malik joined the Cranfill Sumner LLP team after graduating valedictorian from North Carolina Central University School of Law in 2020. As an associate attorney in the Raleigh office, Georgia works primarily in the civil litigation section.
The ABCs of CBD in the Workplace
Lately, products containing CBD (from beer to skin cream to oils that can be diffused and vaped) seem to be all the rage. Why are CBD products suddenly turning up everywhere (your local Sheetz convenience store for example)? Blame it on the Farm Bill! The Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018 (otherwise known as the U.S. Farm Bill), removed hemp from the definition of marijuana under the Controlled Substances Act. As a result, hemp is no longer a controlled substance and, because CBD (which stands for cannabidiol) can be derived from hemp, CBD is arguably legal.
So what is the problem? Why are people who are using CBD products still testing positive for “marijuana” and why should employers be concerned?
CBD is a chemical compound found in the Cannabis family of plants. Notably, Cannabis has two main species – the hemp plant and the marijuana plant. CBD is not believed to have psychoactive properties. In other words, cannabidiol will not get you high. The other primary chemical compound found in Cannabis plants is THC (tetrahydrocannabinol).
THC does have psychoactive properties and is known as the compound that causes the “high.” THC is also the compound that is evaluated for drug testing purposes. One of the main differences between hemp and marijuana is the concentration of CBD vs. THC that each contains. Hemp, by definition (as noted in the Farm Bill), contains 0.3% or less of THC. Marijuana, can have THC concentrations of up to 20%. CBD can be and is derived from both plant species, but for purposes of technical legality, only hemp-derived CBD is legal under the Farm Bill. To obtain marijuana-derived CBD, in states where marijuana is not legal, an individual would require certification to use medicinal marijuana.
With that mini-science lesson out of the way, what does all of this mean for employers?
Certain CBD products – oils for example – are marketed and sold as dietary supplements that can combat a variety of ailments, for example anxiety and insomnia. The FDA does not regulate the safety and purity of dietary supplements. Accordingly, there is no governmental organization confirming that the CBD product contains (or rather only contains) the ingredients contained on the label. Relative to employer drug testing concerns, there is no governmental organization checking that CBD supplements are actually derived from hemp and do not contain more than 0.3% THC. Thus, there is a risk that the CBD supplement is not what it says it is and an employee who is “only using CBD,” may nonetheless test positive for marijuana on a drug test. Indeed, several lawsuits have been filed against CBD manufacturers arguing that products marketed as containing only CBD and being THC free, have resulted in employees failing employer required drug tests.
Accordingly, employees using, or claiming to use, “only CBD” has created a haze of uncertainty for employers and how such claims, which typically follow a positive drug screen, should be handled.
For purposes of employees regulated by the U.S. Department of Transportation (i.e. school bus drivers and truck drivers), the answer is clear. Last month, the DOT issued a “CBD Notice” stating plainly
The Department of Transportation’s Drug and Alcohol Testing Regulation, Part 40, does not authorize the use of Schedule I drugs, including marijuana, for any reason. Furthermore, CBD use is not a legitimate medical explanation for a laboratory-confirmed marijuana positive result. Therefore, Medical Review Officers will verify a drug test confirmed at the appropriate cutoffs as positive, even if an employee claims they only used a CBD product.
In issuing this Notice, the DOT referenced cautionary statements issued by the FDA:
The FDA has cautioned the public that: “Consumers should beware purchasing and using any [CBD] products.” The FDA has stated: “It is currently illegal to market CBD by adding it to a food or labeling it as a dietary supplement.” Also, the FDA has issued several warning letters to companies because their products contained more CBD than indicated on the product label.
So, for DOT regulated drug testing, the answer is clear – CBD is not a get out of jail free card. Regardless of the alleged reason for the positive test, a positive test for marijuana will be a positive test for marijuana. Employees in DOT regulated positions should act accordingly.
But what about non-DOT regulated employees? The answer is not as clear, but there are a few common sense principles that employers can use to address and hopefully diffuse this issue. First, as we’ve discussed in prior blog posts, employees who are certified under state law to use medical marijuana have certain protections (protection against discrimination, for example). As a result, many employers have modified their drug testing policies to include exceptions that apply to employees who are certified to use medical marijuana. Because an employee who is using an over the counter CBD supplement likely is not certified to use medical marijuana, that employee would not be protected by the state medical marijuana act. Accordingly, employers may want to include a notation in their drug testing policies that the term “medical marijuana” refers only to marijuana that is obtained in accordance with a state medical marijuana program.
Second, employers should remember that employees don’t know what they don’t know. If an employee does not realize that using CBD oil that he obtained online could jeopardize his employment, he is going to be quite upset when he tests positive for marijuana and is fired. Accordingly, employees should be advised that there is a risk to using CBD products, that drug testing facilities will not consider alleged CBD use as a legitimate medical reason for a positive drug test and that, if an employee tests positive and does not have a medical marijuana card, the company may treat the positive test as a violation of the drug testing policy.
Finally, employees who question an employer for implementing the above-referenced practices could be directed to the FDA issued guidance on CBD products.
We’ve said it before, and we’ll say it again, if you have not revised your drug testing policy to address the issues created by medical marijuana and CBD, there is no time like the present. Should you need assistance with your policy revision or with crafting appropriate notices to your employees, do not hesitate to contact any member of the McNees Labor and Employment Group.
Workplace drug testing in Pennsylvania and its limits
In many states, there are laws against bosses testing employees for drug use. Pennsylvania does not have restrictions preventing private employers from checking their workers.
There are many arguments for why testing may violate the civil rights of jobholders. Here are some reasons why a test might reveal drugs, followed by a few legal rationales for the results.
Causes of failing a workplace drug test
Drug tests check for popular narcotics, including marijuana, cocaine, and opiates, including unprescribed codeine. If any of these drugs are present, expect to lose your job.
In America, only South Dakota, Idaho, and Nebraska have outlawed cannabidiol oil. Although non-psychotropic and legal in Pennsylvania, CBD can give a positive reading. This is especially possible if you take more than 2,000 milligrams per day.
Second-hand exposure can also be the culprit for testing positive for weed.
Reasons against giving a workplace drug test
For reasons relating to health, you may be taking drugs according to orders from a doctor. Drug usage under these conditions has protection under The Americans with Disabilities Act. Thus, it is not considered a narcotics crime.
Employers are forbidden from singling out groups of individuals. Treatment should never change based on age, gender, race, or any other immutable factor. Those who do could be guilty of workplace discrimination.
Likewise, defamation is impermissible. Bosses who drug test with the intent of embarrassing someone can face prosecution.
Learn the legal parameters surrounding this sensitive topic. If you do, you will be better able to dispute any unfavorable readings.